Ass Hat
Home
News
Events
Bands
Labels
Venues
Pics
MP3s
Radio Show
Reviews
Releases
Buy$tuff
Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls
  
  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food
  
  New Thread
  New Poll
Miscellaneous
Links
E-mail
Search
End Ass Hat
login

New site? Maybe some day.
Posting Anonymously login: [Forgotten Password]
returntothepit >> discuss >> The Thing: Prequel (10/14) by aaron_michael on Oct 9,2011 4:35pm
Add To All Your Pages!
toggletoggle post by aaron_michael  at Oct 9,2011 4:35pm
Anyone else doing this?



toggletoggle post by reimroc at Oct 9,2011 4:39pm
I'm planning on seeing it. Only because I fucking LOVE the 50s and 80s versions of the film. Hoping they didn't completely fuck it up.



toggletoggle post by Alexecutioner at Oct 9,2011 4:39pm
probably not on the 14th but might try to make it that weekend



toggletoggle post by nekronautloggedin at Oct 9,2011 5:23pm
I think Ross and I are going to kill ourselves at this on Friday.



toggletoggle post by the mex nli at Oct 9,2011 6:55pm
I'm going just to witness said lovers dual suicide



toggletoggle post by ridahsofdizoom at Oct 10,2011 9:36am
Now I know what I'm taking the girl to this friday, she just saw the 80s version last night for the first time.



toggletoggle post by AndrewBastard  at Oct 10,2011 10:42am
MIGHT



toggletoggle post by Yeti at Oct 10,2011 10:48am
no thanks.



toggletoggle post by aaron_michael  at Oct 10,2011 10:58am
Yeti said[orig][quote]
no thanks.


You're not even curious in the slightest?



toggletoggle post by sir_coughsalot at Oct 10,2011 11:32am
i have to. just like i had to see the exorcist when they came out with 'the crap version youve never seen for good reason' and the texas chainsaw remake, etc, etc. i have to know. besides i was glad it wasnt a full on remake of a remake and that theyre actually doing something vaguely imaginative with it. too bad it'll be full of cgi but that's inevitable with a story like the thing.
but they'd better do this shit right. someone better slit their fucking throat, there'd better be an axe left behind in the wall , and it had fucking better boil down to the last two norwegians and not go off on some bullshit 'directors license' twist.



toggletoggle post by AndrewBastard  at Oct 10,2011 11:37am
I liked the Halloween prequel..



toggletoggle post by Yeti at Oct 10,2011 12:44pm
aaron_michael said[orig][quote]
Yeti said[orig][quote]
no thanks.


You're not even curious in the slightest?


The Thing is one of my favorite movies ever created. i have zero faith in modern day film-making, and even though this isn't a remake, i just don't want to see some shitty bullshit associated with the name. but if i hear overwhelmingly positive reviews, i will wait for the DVD. i still don't want to pay 10 bucks to sit in a movie theater to see it.



toggletoggle post by aaron_michael  at Oct 10,2011 1:14pm
sir_coughsalot said[orig][quote]
it'll be full of cgi but that's inevitable with a story like the thing.


I totally disagree. I feel that right now, animatronic and effects should have improved by leaps and bounds since the early 80's and studios should quit being cheap and make the film worth it.
Regardless, The Thing is one of my favorites and my curiosity is getting the best of me.



toggletoggle post by nekronautloggedin at Oct 10,2011 1:51pm
New issue of Horror Hound is all about The Thing reboot, 1982, original flick and the story it's all based from.

They made mention that the sfx dudes tried to use as little CGI as possible.



toggletoggle post by reimroc at Oct 10,2011 1:52pm
Fuck CGI movie makers need to go back to using real special effects and animatronics. The stuff looks and feels way more real than some image on a computer.



toggletoggle post by BlackoutRick at Oct 10,2011 5:28pm
sir_coughsalot said[orig][quote]
i have to. just like i had to see the exorcist when they came out with 'the crap version youve never seen for good reason' and the texas chainsaw remake, etc, etc. i have to know. besides i was glad it wasnt a full on remake of a remake and that theyre actually doing something vaguely imaginative with it. too bad it'll be full of cgi but that's inevitable with a story like the thing.
but they'd better do this shit right. someone better slit their fucking throat, there'd better be an axe left behind in the wall , and it had fucking better boil down to the last two norwegians and not go off on some bullshit 'directors license' twist.


This. Also that dude slit his wrists as well. It was all frozen as he sit in that chair. Pretty sure its a prequel and therefore the Norwegian's story. This also means we will see what the fuckin thing looks like in it's original form. Im interested.



toggletoggle post by narkybark   at Oct 10,2011 8:33pm
I'm thoroughly prepared for this to suck; the problem is that even if it's average, it will still feel like sucking because the Carpenter version is a masterpiece. That being said, if it can be pulled off, I'll be the first to cheer. No jump scares and more creepiness, plz.



toggletoggle post by The_Oak_Conclave  at Oct 10,2011 9:39pm
reimroc said[orig][quote]
Fuck CGI movie makers need to go back to using real special effects and animatronics. The stuff looks and feels way more real than some image on a computer.


Agreed! Looking back at the original The Thing movie there are a few scenes that look dated but a lot of the stuff is awesomely gross because they used animatronics slathered in vaseline.



toggletoggle post by goatcatalyst   at Oct 11,2011 12:37am
Hoping for a ZJ in the theatre Friday night. I'm gonna feed her banana creme pie from Michael's Trattoria beforehand so it's not like I don't deserve it



toggletoggle post by aaron_michael  at Oct 14,2011 1:03pm
7:45 at the Lowell Cinemas.



toggletoggle post by Ridahs at Oct 14,2011 10:57pm
I beat you Aaron, saw the 715 at Lowell







Spoilahs, don't read












First, extremely happy that they kept the theme song pretty much the same, the rest of the score was Marco Beltrami's interpretation of Ennio's style.

Negatives: The whole scene with the alien in the ship seemed useless, why was it trying to leave, I highly doubt it would have thought that it could go north without getting shot down.
I think they showed the creature too much, sometimes it was just too cheesy, like when the girl creature is running around. I feel like less would have been more. The cgi was tolerable but too much for a purist like me. The creature's sounds weren't as creepy, the one scene from the 80s that always creeps me out is the one with the long arms creature burning and making the deep moaning noise.

Positives: The characters are more likable and this you feel more sympathy for them when they die. Lars was a bad ass. They didn't create anything new to the myth, other than the it-can't-absorb-inorganic-stuff which was cool and added to the story. I loved the fact that the creature had more parts to it, much more insect like in some scenes and much more tentacled-toothed in others. There was also much more of a paranoid you don't know who is the thing element in this film and I loved when the Norwegians were trying to get their fellow Norwegian to side against the Americans.
The best part was the end credits where they tie the two films together, I think the one shot with the dog running was taken straight from the 80s version.

Obviously not going to match the 80s version but def a great homage and a good film, hopefully it inspires more alien/creature horror films.

questions left: Who was the dude who slit his wrists at the end, couldn't figure out which guy it was

if the helicopter crashes and the thing can only be killed with fire or ice, on as it is a cellular virus alien sorta, doesn't that mean that the one from the crash is still out there? Was that the dog?

What happens with the chick? Does she go to the Russian base? Maybe they could make a third film where she goes to the russian base and we get to see the commies rescue Kieth David and Kurt Russel and they team up and fight the creature. It would be useless but still entertaining, they could ratchet up the anti-communism theme, as the book the films are all based on is basically a metaphor for the red scare.

Bottom line, as a stand alone it is probably one of the best films to come out in theaters this year or in a while.



toggletoggle post by whiskey_weed_and_women  at Oct 15,2011 1:51am
Shit was fun but def dvd material



toggletoggle post by aaron_michael  at Oct 15,2011 8:03am
My friends bailed on seeing the movie 10 minutes before it began, so I went to the PAs show instead. I'm thinking this is just gonna be something I pirate.



toggletoggle post by bobnomaamrooney at Oct 15,2011 12:23pm
Wait a minute, that bitch from Scott Pilgrim doesn't suffer a horrible, disfiguring death? There goes one of my main motivations for wanting to see this.



toggletoggle post by Sacreligion at Oct 15,2011 12:57pm
Ramona Flowers should be sitting on my face at all times. Bob Rooney can fahck off.



toggletoggle post by aaron_michael  at Oct 15,2011 1:19pm
Sacreligion said[orig][quote]
Ramona Flowers should be sitting on my face at all times.


Girl is a babe. That colored hair shit be damned.



toggletoggle post by Blessed Offal NLI at Oct 15,2011 1:30pm
bobnomaamrooney said[orig][quote]
Wait a minute, that bitch from Scott Pilgrim doesn't suffer a horrible, disfiguring death? There goes one of my main motivations for wanting to see this.



yea and her survival is total bullshit. movie was ok.



toggletoggle post by demondave at Oct 15,2011 11:42pm


I liked it. I have heard and read critiques that note a lack of suspense when compared to what the carpenter film had, but I can't take that seriously. We know what happens after this. It's not bad film.





toggletoggle post by bobnomaamrooney at Oct 16,2011 3:41am
Any movie that doesn't end with Ramona Flowers' mutilation sucks.



toggletoggle post by aaron_michael  at Oct 19,2011 7:51am
Helicopter scene was lulz from then on.



toggletoggle post by aaron_michael  at Oct 19,2011 7:59am
Ridahs said[orig][quote]

questions left: Who was the dude who slit his wrists at the end, couldn't figure out which guy it was


The British dude who they was originally blamed to have cleaned up the blood in the shower.


Ridahs said[orig][quote]

if the helicopter crashes and the thing can only be killed with fire or ice, on as it is a cellular virus alien sorta, doesn't that mean that the one from the crash is still out there? Was that the dog?


Obviously it can't be killed by either since ice just contained it, and after getting torched, the split-faced Thing is still alive in the OG remake to snag Bennings.


Ridahs said[orig][quote]

What happens with the chick? Does she go to the Russian base? Maybe they could make a third film where she goes to the russian base and we get to see the commies rescue Kieth David and Kurt Russel and they team up and fight the creature. It would be useless but still entertaining, they could ratchet up the anti-communism theme, as the book the films are all based on is basically a metaphor for the red scare.


No, that would be dumb.



toggletoggle post by bobnomaamrooney at Oct 19,2011 9:40am
Next movie should just be Ramona Flowers being beaten, mutilated and killed by McReady and Childs. Who then proceed to dp her corpse and burn it after they're done.



toggletoggle post by FuckIsMySignature at Mar 23,2012 4:49pm
In this movie: FLAMETHROWERS.


also fuck CGI. cool parts but stupid movie that could have been done better... or just not at all.



Enter a Quick Response (advanced response>>)
Username: (enter in a fake name if you want, login, or new user)SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
Message:  b i u  add: url  image  video(?)show icons
remember:spell something wrong or you=narc
[default homepage] [print][8:16:13pm Apr 27,2024
load time 0.05826 secs/12 queries]
[search][refresh page]