http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/11/switching-to-grass-fed-beef/?hp

NY times blog about grass fed meat.

but grass fed doesn't come pre-stuffed with spaghetti.

it comes stuffed with raviolis

I'm pretty sure grass fed meat comes stuffed with cocks

i want human fed beef.

typical comment a yeti would make

i wish i could live in a cave and eat bones.

Problem with this article is that it still vilifies saturated fat. Yes, grass fed meat is leaner but that's not why it's better. As the article correctly alludes to, the omega-3 to omega-6 ratio of the animal is more in balance with the optimal 1:1 ratio for health.

Also, in general when you buy grass fed you're supporting small farms and humane methods of cattle farming. It's a bit more expensive (depending on where or from whom you buy it) but it's worth it and tastes better.

Submit the correction.

he lives in mordor and eats super nintendo games

Ha, not worth it. It takes a bit more than saying they're wrong in calling the fat attached to red meat unhealthy. They wouldn't believe me just like you probably don't believe me.

There's enough research out there to prove it though. Nevermind the fact that our cell walls and brain are made of fat.

lies. my brain is made of a neural net processor, a learning computer.

Probably right.

Meat is murder.

Yeah I hate crusade against fat! It's is a necessary element to the diet.

The problem with grass-fed labeling is it confuses people. A farmer can get a grass fed label but only put cows out to pasture for 3 months out of the year, the rest of the year they are eating grains inside of a barn.

Your best bet is always Bison, native animal, more protein, more vitamins, lives outside at all times except for storms of course, eats grass/hay. And it's illegal to give Bison Hormones or antibiotics.


And this junk about people arguing about organic or earth friendly food being expensive is null as conventional food is much more expensive the costs are just not direct, IE worse for your health (means more medical bills on average) Worse for the animals, worse for the environment, worse for people in third world countries (price hikes and exported american beef always cause farmers in other countries to not bother with raising their own meat animals.)

I find that the problem is still the same, too many people.

If we had an ideal population or if we pushed everyone into urban areas rather than spreading them out in a wide net of concrete in mini-malls across land that could be used for farming/raising game animals, we could not bother with cattle for meat

we eat too much meat anyways. The healthiest cultures usually only consume a few pounds a week, Many americans eat a couple pounds of cooked meat a day.

We also don't eat enough fish, but that's good because there's too many of us and the fish populations are already pushed to the limits of consumption.

solution. total all out world war.

Normally I'd be like OH LOL YOU FUNNY GUY!
But you said you wanted to become a vegetarian so