http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/10/18/child.porn/index.html

Joe Christianni could not be reached for comment.

Nor could MSD.

This was the best part of the story:

"Among the suspects was a former counselor at a Bible camp and a longtime Boy Scout leader and middle-school sports coach, the officials said."

Josh_Martin said:

Haha -- the punctuation indicates that they are talking about one person that held all these jobs (and was into itty-bitty-titty)? If so, mega-scumbag...

again...where's the death penalty to erase these pedophiles?

Josh_Martin said:

We had a gym teacher that was a wicked toucher. Wore those creepy blue snap-fastened gym teacher shorts, was really into "helping" kids over the vault horse during little-kid gymnastics, you know the type. He got punched right in the grill by a ten-year old for getting a little too grabby on the mat one time in class, that was priceless.

Years later, a good friend of mine worked at the video store in town, and he'd come in an rent all kinds of messed up gay porn. And by messed up gay porn, I mean not just regular gay porn, but extra weird stuff, bondage, food sex, etc. Shane said the dude could never look him in the eye.

Wicked reassuring to know he still teaches there.

Join REPKA!!!
http://www.nostatusquo.com/ACLU/ohBROTHER/REPKA.html

Honestly, where's the harm in jerking off to infants?

The only reason it's even illegal is because the people who write the laws think it's 'icky'.

If lawmakers didn't drink, drinking would also be illegal

If they didn't smoke, cigrettes would be illegal.

If they didn't think a boy kissing another boy was 'icky' gay marriage would be legal.

We all live under an oppressive government.

niccolai said:

What's really fucked, is that there was a law they were attempting to shove through a few years back that made fucking cartoons of under-age shit illegal, classified right alonside real kiddie porn. I don't know if it made it through, though. From a certain point of view, you have a point - no one's getting hurt when people look at it. It's the bastards who are making it that need hemp neckties. But, hey, it's me, Captain Anarchist talking, so go figure.

niccolai said:

i agree with you. there's no harm in jerking off to infants as long as you don't act on desires and do something to the actual infant. if it's just a picture and you're jerking off to it, no one gets hurt.

DestroyYouAlot said:

your stories are excellent today.

My post was a joke post more than anything, but in all honesty, what's wrong with animated child porn if no ones getting hurt?

other than G Dubya thinking 'ewww thats icky' What the fuck negative effects does it have?

You can worship and donate money to the catholic faith... but you can't jerk off to fake child nudity.

We do NOT live in a democracy.

if you're not a pervert, you can kiss that middle school gymnastics coach career goodbye. my gym teacher in high school hadn't even finished writing "child molestor" in black sharpie letters on his resume before he got hired.

we had a gym teacher whose favorite time of year was when the boys and girls would go on seperate sides of the gym so the boys could wrestle and the girls could do gymnastics or something. this gym teacher was always so excited to watch us wrestle. his eyes would bulge out of his head just thinking about it.

there was a gym teacher at Auburn Middle School that would sit in the boys locker room while everyone was changing, and he would just sit in the corner and stare. disgusting

i worked at McDonalds in Auburn about 8 years ago, and we hired this mexican dude who wanted to work in the play area, and only the play area. the kids loved him, he loved the kids, and years later i saw his name in the courthouse records for child rape and molestation. what drives these people? what is enticing about a child?

whats with all the scumbag gym teachers?

gym teachers are usually scumbags i guess. i remember my first gym teacher. he was kind of an asshole, but never seemed like a molestor. he was one of the few who don't like kids.

what drives these people? what is enticing about a child? >>

non-boob and no-ass nubile bodies, duh.

niccolai said:

do you hear yourself ? people are getting off to pictures of infants?!.... INFANTS! doesn't matter if no one gets hurt.. the thought alone should be disgusting enough. Plus... whose to say noone's getting hurt? you dont know that... pictures and thoughts of doing it probably .. i would think.. would lead to more of it actually being done... fucking disgusting . These people should be dragged for miles behind an 18 wheeler

as long as it doesn't lead to things actually being done, no one gets hurt. yeah, it's disgusting, but if no one gets hurt it shouldn't be a problem.

futher more... i highly doubt that just b/c one dirty politician thought wacking off to pictures of innocent children was " ok" .. that it would become legal...
gay marriage is a completely seperate topic.. they are two grown ADULTS who WILLINGLY do it.. kids have no say or control when it happens to them...
if preventing this from happening is an "oppressive government" then i'm all fucking for it

how do you know noone is getting hurt?

i didn't say no one is getting hurt. i said it's ok IF no one is getting hurt. i'm not a fucking all-powerful wizard. i can't monitor what people are doing at all times.

really your not an all powerful wizard ? wow... i'm completely shocked...

do you hear yourself ? people are getting off to pictures of infants?!.... INFANTS! doesn't matter if no one gets hurt.. the thought alone should be disgusting enough.

That's my point... the only reason it's punnishable with a jail sentance is because the people who don't do it are in the majority and they think it's gross.

Think about that for a minute. We live in a world where 'gross' constitutes a crime, and jail sentance.



Plus... whose to say noone's getting hurt? you dont know that... pictures and thoughts of doing it probably .. i would think.. would lead to more of it actually being done... fucking disgusting .

Well until someone here cites a case study by a reputable body that sais all studies indicate jerking off to a sketch of a child cause dimencia on a scale large enough to cause them to rape children, than, I'm to say no one's getting hurt.

I would suggest the VAST majority of people who fantacize about under age children are not child molestors. I would than suggest WAY more childrapes are performed by people who AREN'T child porn connisuers.

But that's the world we live in.. 'There are more of us than there are of you and some of the things you do don't rub us the right way, so we will oppress you for it'

These people should be dragged for miles behind an 18 wheeler

Yes. in a lake on water skiis behind an 18 wheeler retro fitted with a boat bottom because water skiing is fun.


or is water skiing gross to you as well? maybe we should ban that because there are more people who have water skied in their life and raped a child than who jerk off to cartoon children and raped a child.


Lolicon animation is harmless.

my point is that it is NEVER ok... how would you feel if somehow your daughter made it on that website? regardless of whether or not she was hurt or even knew about it is pretty insignificant when compared to the nature of such horrid acts... these are kids! ...

ariavette said:

I'm not sure how you jerk off, but the way most people do it, you'd have a pretty hard time hurting anyone with it.


Well, I don't mean myself, of course. I can't "finish" unless a puppy dies, but that's not representative of the general population, I think.

dreadkill said:

I lead a rich life.

ariavette said:

You took my post out of context. Not one politician. If every person in power were out in the open about enjoying animated under-age pornography sence the conseption of the country, it would not be illegal right now.

Gay marriage and watching nudie cartoon 12 year olds are obviously different, but their reasons for being socially unacceptable/illegal, I would suggest, are the same.

ok first of all it's not just gross.. it's fucking wrong... while i see your point and agree that maybe it applys to other area's of our retarded government.. this is not one of them
your comparing water skiing to child rape?
again... something you do willingly.. you think these kids aren't gonna be hurt if they grow up and find out some dirty old men beat off to pic's of em when they were little.. ?

ariavette said:

No, these are cartoon animations of kids. child rape and sexual exploitation of children is not what I am debating.

ariavette said:

once again, child rape isn't what I'm argueing should be legally tolerated.

niccolai said:


that makes no fucking sense... GROWN ADULTS SHOULD NOT BE GETTING OFF TO PICTURES OF LITTLE KIDS! it has nothing to do with fucking society or the government.. it will NEVER be right!

niccolai said:

i understand that... thanks

ariavette said:

Why, because it doesn't rub you the right way?

because studies show people into erotic annimation and lolicon aren't psychotics or raposts.

b/c it doesn't rub me the right way? UMM SHOULD IT?
no it fucking doesn't rub me the right way b/c its fucking disgusting and horrible...
studies show? i thought our government was opresive., and society too judgemental.. . now you qoute their findings?

I should be able to draw pictures of aliens molesting a 2 week old and shitting on it's face and jerk off to it if I want (studies also show that people who enjoy animated alien rape are also, not cereal rapists).

The point is that studies show it doesn't lead to child rape, so the only reason it's not allowed is because people think it's 'gross' and 'wrong'.

I personally don't think people should go to jail because people in power think 'ew, that's gross' and killed by their inmates who also think it's 'icky'



I'm going to get a fruit rollup now. and if anyone tries to stop me, they are going to pay the dearest of consiquences.

ariavette said:

The question is, do you understand the difference between making the stuff and observing it? I watch a lot of messed up videos of people getting decaptitated and such on YouTube, should I be charged with murder? You ever see a film on the holocaust in school? You are now a war criminal. Do you see any parallels, here?

ariavette said:


Let me get this straight, people should go to jail because you think hand sketch pictures of naked 16 year old girls who don't even exist are gross?

Horrible is relative.

Just because a government is oppressive doesn't mean they don't conduct worth-while studies.. and if you think society is NOT judgemental you're more of a psychopath than any animated childrape fan.

DestroyYouAlot said:


in one aspect, that's a point I'm trying to make. should people who watch beastiality be put in jail?

just because someone watches videos of a dude getting fucked by a horse (or better yet, looks at drawn pictures of a dude getting reamed by a horse) doesn't mean they are criminals and it's none of the governments fucking buisiness.

niccolai said:

And, besides, that's hot.

+1 brotha

You all got raped as children. It's very obvious.

Oh come on, we all wanna touch some little boys sometime.

this thread is great now.

ariavette said:

i used to be an all powerful wizard, but then i jerked off to drawings of babies with wizard hats and the board of all powerful wizards revoked my license to practice all powerful wizardry.

dreadkill said:

Did you boil your spells in cauldrons of black gold? One time I cast Melf's acid arrow at my mom 'cause she was all yelling at me to clean up my room.

i used level 12 wizard powers with my staff of grundle.

I raped as a child.

I hate children.

RichHorrorNLI said:

Thanks for sharin', bro.

dreadkill said:

haha.. thats too bad man ...

second thread today that made me sick to my stomach

DestroyYouAlot said:

Curse you and your internet wizardry.

That would actually make a good song for Guttural secrete: "Beating off to infants".