|
New site? Maybe some day.
|
tom: So you all think it's a big joke and you all just are quick to put the blame on me. Some fucking friends I have. I know I made a mistake but how many of you have gotten drunk and done something stupid? Don't pass judgement on me. I specifically told Tom in the bar that I made a mistake and I DIDN'T want them on the website. He still disregarded that and he has no right to have put them on here. You wanna see me be a bitch? You all wanna pass judgement some more and make a joke out of it? Well fuck you. I want them down by the end of tonight or I'm calling my fucking lawyer. |
|
i bought him that lip thing! |
|
Tripp!!!!! cuz he's fucking hot!!!! |
|
FACT 1: all hot guys are homosexual
FACT 2: I'm not homosexual |
|
the_reverend said:
FACT 2: I'm not homosexual |
=[ |
|
sorry spaldino he's myne
he is still hot though |
|
wait a minute, not all hot guys are gay.
Alvarez from Oz isn't gay.
He says in the show that he knows he is hot.
Adabesse on the other hand, is not hot but really gay.
Atleast he never says he is hot, but he definately is into dudes.
I am probably the ugliest person around, does that make me the least gay?
|
|
i like my beer cold, my tv loud and my homosexuals FLAMING |
|
xmikex, i heard you are single now.
maybe we can do dinner and a movie?
|
|
weird.. I thought this was a thread about making out with me.
but you two guys decided to turn it into some sort of liebmacher fest.
thanks. |
|
sigh ... i should have never bought you that raspberry chapstick dammit
now i fear tables are turning...am I going to make the Rev gay? |
|
not for all the tea in china.
not if you could sing like a bird.
not for all north carolina.
I will never be into guys, they are too hairy, smelly, and covered in dicks+balls |
|
hahahaha
are you listening to that CD now?
PS: i like your smell..call me crazy |
|
the_reverend said: FACT 1: all hot guys are homosexual
FACT 2: I'm not homosexual |
Oh Oh! I learned how to do this in numbers class! Ok, here it goes: Assuming the two facts you gave are true, I can make another true statement: You are not hot.
Hurray for numbers class! |
|
Math Proof youi mean.
p => q
q => r
therefore p =>r
however, joe/nc took this and made an incorrect statement by taking
p => q
q => r
therefore r => p
which isn't correct cause they don't have a <=> relationship.
you can't go backwards in an implies statement joe!
you get a 0% on this test, you should have slacked off.
(did I mention I have a computer science degree?) |
|
yum |
|
psst... he's legal now.... hit that shit! |
|
uhhh what do you think happened when we went to PA? |
|
ummm then post pictures so we can see the sexiness!
c'mon! |
|
hellooooooooo you gotta pay for that shit! |
|
let's trade |
|
I think there is going to be some anal ez.. with numbing gel in these pictures.
it'll be on the bed-table next to the bible! |
|
succubus said: now i fear tables are turning...am I going to make the Rev gay? |
No, Spiderman will make him gay. That's fact #3. |
|
actually he loves Wolverine |
|
dirtykittie said: Tripp!!!!! cuz he's fucking hot!!!! |
From the Unseen? |
|
the_reverend said: Math Proof youi mean.
p => q
q => r
therefore p =>r
however, joe/nc took this and made an incorrect statement by taking
p => q
q => r
therefore r => p
which isn't correct cause they don't have a <=> relationship.
you can't go backwards in an implies statement joe!
you get a 0% on this test, you should have slacked off.
(did I mention I have a computer science degree?) |
Well, Rev, not quite. You see, I used the Law of Detachment to state my fact. Your example shows the Chain Rule. See the difference?
|
|
The law of inverse proportions.
Aka the more you like me the more I hate you. This works especially well with childish incompetant girls. |
|
i guess this thread took another turn
|
|
the_reverend said: http://www.creatavision.com/law-of-detachment.htm ? |
That isnt the Law of Detachment I was refering to. An example of what I was talking about would be: If a, then b. Assuming a is true, then b must also be true. The two facts you gave ("All hot guys are homosexual";"I am not homosexual") would act as a, so be would be "I am not hot".
My math teacher would be so proud. |
|
retzam said: That isnt the Law of Detachment I was refering to. An example of what I was talking about would be: If a, then b. Assuming a is true, then b must also be true. The two facts you gave ("All hot guys are homosexual";"I am not homosexual") would act as a, so be would be "I am not hot".
My math teacher would be so proud. |
no... (s)he wouldn't.. cause you got it wrong.
that is a false argument.
that's the type of arguement that people use to convince people of things all the time...
you need dual cuasal relationships to allow for that... aka bidirectionalimplies. <=>
a since implies (=>) only allows a relationship to flow one direction.
I can prove it with set theory and some nice venn diagrams if you want me to... |
|
xmikex said: i like my beer cold, my tv loud and my homosexuals FLAMING |
que: over the rainbow |
|
the_reverend said: retzam said:That isnt the Law of Detachment I was refering to. An example of what I was talking about would be: If a, then b. Assuming a is true, then b must also be true. The two facts you gave ("All hot guys are homosexual";"I am not homosexual") would act as a, so be would be "I am not hot".
My math teacher would be so proud. |
no... (s)he wouldn't.. cause you got it wrong.
that is a false argument.
that's the type of arguement that people use to convince people of things all the time...
you need dual cuasal relationships to allow for that... aka bidirectionalimplies. <=>
a since implies (=>) only allows a relationship to flow one direction.
I can prove it with set theory and some nice venn diagrams if you want me to... |
Well, your statement is a bidirectional statement. You see, your conditional statement ("All hot guys are homosexuals") can be changed into the form: If a guy is hot, then he is a homosexual. This means that...fuck your right. Nevermind. I don't know why, but before now I didn't realize that this statement doesnt mean that all homosexuals are hot. I renounce my argument. |
|
joe did it said:
haha, thanks |
|
joe/notcommon said: joe did it said:
Nice...fuckin, life.
|
|
|
Terence said: joe/notcommon said:joe did it said:
Nice...fuckin, life.
|
i'll ram that bass right up her metalcore vagina |
|
|
Bump
You know you want her. |
|
Arch Enemy is full of fun hooks and tits to boot!! |
|
It's too bad she sucks, and not in a good way. |
|
DeOdiumMortis said: It's too bad she sucks, and not in a good way. |
Really? I think she is a great vocalist! |
|
I didn't mind her at first, seemed more lively and into it than the older singer. But since then it looks like they're going the way of the big-headed rock stars, not full-blown yet but they're well on their way if they don't catch themselves first.
Whenever anyone wants to listen to Arch Enemy I just put on Carcass' Heartwork. That's my tastes. |
|
DeOdiumMortis said: I didn't mind her at first, seemed more lively and into it than the older singer. But since then it looks like they're going the way of the big-headed rock stars, not full-blown yet but they're well on their way if they don't catch themselves first.
Whenever anyone wants to listen to Arch Enemy I just put on Carcass' Heartwork. That's my tastes. |
Yes, yes, I happen to like Arch Enemy more than Carcass, but I have to say that Heartwork is a fucking awesome album and definately Carcass's best work. |
|
i think arch enemy are still goin great. and angela's fuckin foxy! |
|
id like to make out with myself |
|
dyingmuse said: id like to make out with myself |
I always make out with myself.... |
|
I make little houses out of bones. |
|
DeOdiumMortis said: I make little houses out of bones. |
I make big bones... nevermind...
|
|
retzam said: Bump
You know you want her. |
nope |
|
Devin said: i think arch enemy are still goin great. and angela's fuckin foxy! |
Foxy is such a kickass word. I am going to go put the moves on some ladies by calling them foxy. You know what? I really should, cause that would be kickass! |
|
Man it would be even funnier if I was stoned. Picture Jim Breuer as Brian from Half-Baked:
"Wow, you are foxy! Your a fox!"
That would be fucking hilarious. Too bad it wouldnt work. |
[default homepage]
|
[print][ | 2:52:31pm Apr 27,2024 load time 0.10089 secs/15 queries] | [search] | [refresh page] |
|