Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls

  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food

  New Thread
  New Poll

E-mail

New site? Maybe some day.

Username:

SPAM Filter: re-type this

(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)

Message:

UBB enabled. HTML disabled Spam Filtering enabledIcons: (click image to insert) Show All - pop

b i u add: url image video(?)

:	post by Boozegood at 2012-12-17 19:43:19

ShadowSD said	[orig][quote]
I'm just repeating commonly used terms in the analysis of this tragedy, I'm not making any of them up. If you have an issue with the terms, that's fair, but I can tell you I don't go around inventing words.

Because they are obviously slanderous words that put images in peoples heads; when in fact they literally mean absolutely nothing. Please tell me what an 'assault weapon' or a 'military style rifle' is?

And if nukes are Constitutionally debatable but currently aren't allowed, why aren't semi-automatic weapons in the same category?

My research has shown that Nuclear Weapons contradict certain other parts of the constitution. But since I don't have any of that research on hand right now I'm unable to argue that point.

Also, the idea that the ingredients required to create a nuclear weapon can be federally regulated without disturbing the constitution.

[default homepage]

[print][

10:18:00pm Apr 26,2024
load time 0.00700 secs/10 queries]

[search]

[refresh page]