Ass Hat
Home
News
Events
Bands
Labels
Venues
Pics
MP3s
Radio Show
Reviews
Releases
Buy$tuff
Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls
  
  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food
  
  New Thread
  New Poll
Miscellaneous
Links
E-mail
Search
End Ass Hat
login

New site? Maybe some day.
Username:
SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
Message:


UBB enabled. HTML disabled Spam Filtering enabledIcons: (click image to insert) Show All - pop

b i u  add: url  image  video(?)
: post by ark at 2010-04-06 15:30:58
like reim said, IF comcast has their way, you wouldn't see any extra money, and less users hit your site, because they would hold they keys to what their subscribers could access. the internet would become a tiered service like cable tv channels are. you want the social networking package, that's $5 a month. youtube and hulu? $15 a month because that means you'd be watching less tv.

The actual content providers (like how YouTube is part of Google) would be pretty pissed about this. That's why Google is siding with the FCC on this one.

I really don't see this ruling have too many far-reaching implications because of that. Even if Comcast did restrict these there are ways around it. It's the friggin internet.
[default homepage] [print][7:37:36am Apr 30,2024
load time 0.00659 secs/10 queries]
[search][refresh page]