Ass Hat

Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls

  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food

  New Thread
  New Poll

End Ass Hat

New site? Maybe some day.

Username:

SPAM Filter: re-type this

(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)

Message:

UBB enabled. HTML disabled Spam Filtering enabledIcons: (click image to insert) Show All - pop

b i u add: url image video(?)

:	post by soloman at 2007-06-07 09:32:31

xmikex said:

I think that's kind of missing the point. I'm not by any means saying I agree with creationism, or this museum (in fact, I find it all pretty laughable). But I think the point they're trying to make by trying to come at it empirically (if you can call ignoring years and years of already solid research and theory regarding the creation of the word truly "empirical") is that their faith, i.e. the bible alleges certain specific details which they feel they can prove. They're probably (definently) wrong, but I think it's kind of refreshing to see someone from the creationist side approach the subject with at least an ounce of respect for people's intelligence and need for factual evidence. Again, IF you can call it that. Personally, I think it's interesting to hear other arguments like this.

Yeah it's definitly interesting hearing arguments like this. The problem is that looking at the bible empircally is going to fail. And it should. Both the old and new testaments say that faith (believing what is not proven) is the big point anyway, so this exercise in evidence gathering is pointless. I think the goal here, in regards to this musem, was to create a place where the faithful can hide themselves from secular science. Thats stupid and cowardly.

[default homepage]

9:34:23pm Apr 30,2024
load time 0.01137 secs/10 queries]