Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls

  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food

  New Thread
  New Poll

E-mail

New site? Maybe some day.

Username:

SPAM Filter: re-type this

(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)

Message:

UBB enabled. HTML disabled Spam Filtering enabledIcons: (click image to insert) Show All - pop

b i u add: url image video(?)

:	post by xmikex at 2007-06-06 17:37:53

soloman said:

You can't use science to prove that which is faith based. If you could, then it wouldn't be faith anymore.

I think that's kind of missing the point. I'm not by any means saying I agree with creationism, or this museum (in fact, I find it all pretty laughable). But I think the point they're trying to make by trying to come at it empirically (if you can call ignoring years and years of already solid research and theory regarding the creation of the word truly "empirical") is that their faith, i.e. the bible alleges certain specific details which they feel they can prove. They're probably (definently) wrong, but I think it's kind of refreshing to see someone from the creationist side approach the subject with at least an ounce of respect for people's intelligence and need for factual evidence. Again, IF you can call it that. Personally, I think it's interesting to hear other arguments like this.

[default homepage]

[print][

7:16:15am May 01,2024
load time 0.02109 secs/10 queries]

[search]

[refresh page]