Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls

  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food

  New Thread
  New Poll

E-mail

New site? Maybe some day.

Username:

SPAM Filter: re-type this

(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)

Message:

UBB enabled. HTML disabled Spam Filtering enabledIcons: (click image to insert) Show All - pop

b i u add: url image video(?)

:	post by DreamingInExile at 2005-05-16 14:18:58

the_reverend said:

I would give the Q 28-90 and 70-300 a grade of a D.

I'll agree, but my current SLR isn't a super nice one either, I've got a Nikon N65, it's a middle of the road camera. and it came with the 28-90, I needed a lens with Macro capability hence the inexpensive 70-300 (was the best option for me at the time).

the_reverend said:

um... a D2H isn't that much... they are going for under $2K. but if you are worried about size, it's massive compared to the n80 body.

I know the D2h isn't "expensive" but seeing since I don't have the >$2k to spend on a body and pick up other equipment at the same time, it's a waste for me to buy a camera that nice until I have the gear to back it up.

the_reverend said:

the d100 is the esentially same size as the d70/d70s. the d100 just weights a little more (due to the metal substructure). So, you don't mean bulky, you mean the D100 is heavier than the D70.

yeah, I was referring to the weight not the overall size, sorry I should have clarified that.

[default homepage]

[print][

11:08:28am Apr 27,2024
load time 0.01920 secs/10 queries]

[search]

[refresh page]