Ass Hat
Home
News
Events
Bands
Labels
Venues
Pics
MP3s
Radio Show
Reviews
Releases
Buy$tuff
Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls
  
  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food
  
  New Thread
  New Poll
Miscellaneous
Links
E-mail
Search
End Ass Hat
login

New site? Maybe some day.
Username:
SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
Message:


UBB enabled. HTML disabled Spam Filtering enabledIcons: (click image to insert) Show All - pop

b i u  add: url  image  video(?)
: post by __THeMoor__ at 2004-12-13 18:52:01
scream_bleed_repeat said:
all of those sound good excpet the polar ice caps. when and if the ice caps melt the water level will be the same if not lower because those ice caps are displacing water themselves right now.


not true. most of the ice caps are over greenland and or antarctica, therefore they are not displacing any water. also, its less of a question of how much water, but rather how long it is stored. water, like all life materials, runs in cycles through the bioshpere, atmosphere, and lithosphere. there are both long term and short term storage compartments for these materials. things like glacial ice, and fossil fuels are located in long term storage compartments, and the problem arises when these compartments are emptied much faster than they can be filled which is why heating with fossil fuels is wrong and why teh glacial ice caps melting would mean we're all in deep shit.

boom. you just got out nerded.

[default homepage] [print][3:09:30am May 21,2024
load time 0.01117 secs/10 queries]
[search][refresh page]