|
New site? Maybe some day.
|
2,334 crimes per 100,000 people
not bad |
|
portland, maine made number 1 |
|
In worcester, shithole is you! |
|
still funny that Baltimore is more "livable" than worcester. |
|
only parts of Worcester are a shithole. my area was livable until the barbaric tree removal, now its dumpery is exposed and i hate it. i want to move back to the Institute area, it was actually pretty nice there. if you drive half a mile up Salisbury St. you are in an entirely different world. some areas have really been cleaned up, even Piedmont St. isn't a warzone anymore. WORCESTER!! |
|
Apparently that list was compiled by Tyrone Bigguns.
|
|
that's a really good picture, despite it being at the tail end of Lincoln St. which isn't all that nice. |
|
i'm gonna need a fucking monster truck soon avoid the massive amounts of pot holes scattered through out the city. it may be livable but it certainly is not drivable. |
|
i think people look at fitchburg and presume worcester is the same lolol |
|
The only reason Worcester made the list is because Sacreligion is from there. |
|
|
portland, maine made number 1 |
haha, funny, that's where I am now. |
|
kings in a world of shit. congrats. |
|
I'd rather be king in a world of shit than something lower than king in a world of shit. |
|
either way you are covered in shit |
|
|
...however Forbes Magazine thinks we are the bee knees!
|
It's because Forbes Magazine knows about Sacreligion!!!!! |
|
Worcester even looks like a shithole in the photo they used for the article. Apparently they just couldn't get the right angle (ha). |
|
|
either way you are covered in shit |
Actually, I must be king, cuz i haven't got shit all over me. |
|
|
still funny that Baltimore is more "livable" than worcester. |
I'd live in Baltimore, if only for the music scene. |
[default homepage]
|
[print][ | 7:34:02pm Mar 28,2024 load time 0.02072 secs/12 queries] | [search] | [refresh page] |
|