I just remember this old paradox... it's stupid. the answer (unless you are a fucking moron) is the egg.

no.
Intelligent Design > science and logic

you are lucky I like you and your witchcraft.

Only I know the true answer. It is indeed the chicken. Who the fuck keeps the single egg warm so it can hatch, then feeds it? Fucktard. Oh, and God Bless.

a semi-chicken would.
jesus h christ, it's called evolution.

it is neither

it would be something very like a chicken, and over millions of years of breeding the thing in the egg would resemble a chicken more and more, so neither really.

Hey, my Dad made the chicken. Fuck you both.

Jesus sits on the egg to keep it warm; therefore, egg.

Since you love evolution so much, how do you explain this one genius?

hahahahahaha

wrong. the egg came first. a chicken egg would be sat on by a 99.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% chicken. the answer is an egg.

eggs are chickens.

exactly the point I was making.

"i egged the chicken, and then i ate his leg"

THE COCK CAME FIRST.

but what if a tree falls in the forest and no one....


nevermind.

Al Gore came first and invented the chicken.

I am not sure which was first but aliens were involved nonetheless.

Sheldon is the paradox to the paradox.

egg for breakfast, chicken for dinner. unless you're weird...

garfield and friends FTW

but to settle this debate, there were animals who laid eggs millions of years before there was anything resembling a chicken or any other bird

but if you still can't decide, just make a grilled chicken omlette

YETH, THIR!

bro, like um, the vegan chilli came first...

I usually come first. Then the chicken. Eventual the egg comes.

Which came first, the chicken or the egg? Modern science has an answer.
According to evolutionary geneticist John Brookfield, cosmologist Stephen Hawking, and even modern thinker Chris Langdon, the egg came first. Why? DNA.

DNA remains unchanged throughout the life of an organism. Thus, whatever the genetic material is inside the egg will be the same as the that which is inside the grown adult. In other words, conceived as a chicken, hatched as a chicken, live and die as a chicken -- there is no other way. A soaring eagle won't suddenly plummet to earth because it spontaneously turned into a turkey.

Whatever genetic change there was between chicken-like parents and the first true chicken inside the egg must have occurred in the reproductive DNA, sealing the deal: the egg came first.

interesting... how does modern science explain the change in DNA? was it a chronic dose of radiation from the sun to the parent's reproductive organs? or some sort of chemical reaction from stress assocaited with adjusting (or lack thereof) to a changing environment? or a combination of the two?

I don't have an answer and have been confused by this question for a while. this puts an interesting spin on my wednesday afternoon. thank you.