Ass Hat
Home
News
Events
Bands
Labels
Venues
Pics
MP3s
Radio Show
Reviews
Releases
Buy$tuff
Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls
  
  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food
  
  New Thread
  New Poll
Miscellaneous
Links
E-mail
Search
End Ass Hat
login

New site? Maybe some day.
Posting Anonymously login: [Forgotten Password]
returntothepit >> discuss >> this is kinda fucked up, something JoeNC will love ! by whiskey_weed_and_women on Jul 7,2005 11:34pm
Add To All Your Pages!
toggletoggle post by whiskey_weed_and_women  at Jul 7,2005 11:34pm
ok my friend found this, not sure if it's been posted or what but man i thought this was pretty fucked up.



http://www.lilamber.com/

this is an article about trying to pass laws to stop these websites

http://www.bluelineradio.com/lilamber.html

this should be interesting or die off really quickly !



toggletoggle post by DeOdiumMortis  at Jul 7,2005 11:56pm
This is just wrong...



toggletoggle post by powerkok   at Jul 8,2005 12:00am
No shit....
shame on you for even repeating this garbage wx3.

as for a topic of debate....no debate necessary...its wrong, live with it.



toggletoggle post by DaveFromTheGrave  at Jul 8,2005 12:02am
nice to know that legal loopholes work for everyone. Like John Benet Ramsey for example. I'm really glad I fight for the first amendment to continue existing.



toggletoggle post by whiskey_weed_and_women  at Jul 8,2005 12:17am
powerkok said:
No shit....
shame on you for even repeating this garbage wx3.

as for a topic of debate....no debate necessary...its wrong, live with it.


hey i said it was fucked up, i just wanted to point out how fucked up it was. i thought it was fitting to post after the whole debate over the new law about how all porn is now child porn unless you have the documents to prove otherwise. it's pretty fucked up all together.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/06/24/us_law_2257/



toggletoggle post by Josh_hates_you  at Jul 8,2005 12:24am
fuck morals and standards.

damn are my fingers sticky.



toggletoggle post by glam danzig at Jul 8,2005 12:26am
DAVEFROMTHEWANG you're a friggin' perv. Let's just talk about D&D. None of this kiddie sh1t.



toggletoggle post by lil' amber at Jul 8,2005 12:27am
hey boys



toggletoggle post by UNDA COVA at Jul 8,2005 12:28am
watch out. Lil' Amber is actually a 55 year old cop (pig)



toggletoggle post by DaveFromTheGrave  at Jul 8,2005 12:35am
glam danzig said:
DAVEFROMTHEWANG you're a friggin' perv. Let's just talk about D&D. None of this kiddie sh1t.


THAT'S FUNNY. CHILD PORN. HAW HAW.



toggletoggle post by AUTOPSY_666   at Jul 8,2005 3:47am
Wow, that's hot.



toggletoggle post by menstrual_sweatpants_disco   at Jul 8,2005 5:52am
fap fap fap



toggletoggle post by Joe/NotCommon   at Jul 8,2005 7:33am
I'd beat the shit out of that slut



toggletoggle post by babyshaker at Jul 8,2005 11:45am
lol always the romantic



toggletoggle post by menstrual_sweatpants_disco   at Jul 12,2005 3:45pm
this girl is hotter http://www.mia-model.net



toggletoggle post by menstrual_sweatpants_disco   at Jul 12,2005 3:48pm
hell yeah.

http://www.lovely-carry.com/
http://www.carol-model.net/

I wonder if any of these little whores are going to come to the FBI picnick



toggletoggle post by Josh_Martin at Jul 12,2005 3:51pm
I bet her cunt tastes like baby formula.



toggletoggle post by menstrual_sweatpants_disco   at Jul 12,2005 3:55pm
These bitches are so small that you only have to hit them half as hard to knock them out and get down to business.



toggletoggle post by the_reverend   at Jul 12,2005 3:57pm
whoah... there's a line that was crossed there, but I don't want the gov't looking at my boardband on a plane so I will keep my mouth shut and follow the advice of george carlin on that one.



toggletoggle post by IcedEarth77 at Jul 12,2005 4:00pm
Is this technically even porn at all? They are all clothed.



toggletoggle post by the_reverend   at Jul 12,2005 4:01pm
it would not be considered porn. it would be considered "child exploitation".



toggletoggle post by Josh_Martin at Jul 12,2005 4:03pm
the_reverend said:
it would not be considered porn. it would be considered "child exploitation".


I see kids dressed like that at the beach all the time. Why is it any different on the internet?



toggletoggle post by the_reverend   at Jul 12,2005 4:07pm
yeah, that's why I'm not clicking. I don't really think things like that should be illegal, but man.. those sites are as creepy as the thought of you on the beach with a pair of binoculars scoping out the "hotties" from the 6-14yo beach goers.

plus, black esploitation movies are awesome.



toggletoggle post by malettey  at Jul 12,2005 4:11pm
"...it had instructed the FBI to review the pre-teen sites in order to determine whether they are breaking any laws."

i'd like to know how many of these FBI fuckers are having a field day "reviwing" these web sites. i bet there's a good amount of dried up, crusted semen under the desks of the computers these guys "review" the sites on!



toggletoggle post by anonymous at Jul 12,2005 4:15pm
this is totally wrong - someone needs to get this kid to the gym. That shit don't tone itself. She's heading toward chunkyville.



toggletoggle post by Mr McFeely at Jul 12,2005 6:31pm
I'd cum all over her Easy Bake Oven...and Barbie Doll.



toggletoggle post by succubus  at Jul 12,2005 6:56pm edited Jul 12,2005 6:56pm
whoah...gross

i cannot believe the parents let their kids do this

i was looking and saw thong underwear..wtf? she doesn't even have an ass yet...and photos trying to show non existent cleavage...

you know, a couple of weeks ago the rev and i took my neices to the beach (13 and 14) and you should have seen the perves looknig at them.one man in his 60's...looknig at me and them...fuckin gross perve





toggletoggle post by dan_bloodblister at Jul 12,2005 7:06pm
shes probably alot older than she looks



toggletoggle post by succubus  at Jul 12,2005 7:16pm
the sites, which feature girls as young as 6 wearing revealing clothing and striking sexually suggestive poses but display no nudity or overt sexual material that would run afoul of child pornography laws. “It sickens you that a parent would have such disregard for their own child.”

There is ample evidence that the sites, which sell photos and videotapes to members, cater primarily to adults, very few of whom are in the market to hire models. Many — if not most — customers are sexually interested in children, and some are pedophiles, according to law enforcement officials and children’s advocates.



toggletoggle post by succubus  at Jul 12,2005 7:18pm
In one scene, she lifted her skirt, giving the briefest glimpses of underwear. In another, the unidentified cameraman lay on the floor and shot up her skirt as she danced away un-self-consciously

ugh i'm naucious readingthis



toggletoggle post by davefromthegrave  at Jul 12,2005 9:48pm
succubus said:
whoah...gross

i cannot believe the parents let their kids do this

i was looking and saw thong underwear..wtf? she doesn't even have an ass yet...and photos trying to show non existent cleavage...

you know, a couple of weeks ago the rev and i took my neices to the beach (13 and 14) and you should have seen the perves looknig at them.one man in his 60's...looknig at me and them...fuckin gross perve




One thing that should make you feel a little bit better is knowing that those guys pretty much never get laid.



toggletoggle post by the_reverend   at Jul 13,2005 11:10am
and darwin wins!



toggletoggle post by anonymous at Jan 11,2007 9:52am
yo fuck u kid, this shits awsum and mad ppl like it



Enter a Quick Response (advanced response>>)
Username: (enter in a fake name if you want, login, or new user)SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
Message:  b i u  add: url  image  video(?)show icons
remember:skynet is always watching protecting you
[default homepage] [print][8:25:10am Mar 29,2024
load time 0.01519 secs/12 queries]
[search][refresh page]